The support of pursuit of individual passions and interests does not lead to the narrowing of student learning. In the course of mastering that interest, ancillary learning occurs which the student absorbs in order to acquire the tools used in digging deeper into the chosen area. Being allowed to follow one’s path fosters creativity that results in the exploration of ideas previously not considered. When looking at this wholistically, society benefits from the intersection of these individual passions. The diversity of ideas feeds upon itself; it defines our American education system. It is difficult to trust, and arguably inefficient, to allow the interest of the student to drive the course of his education. Establishing an organized system where the child is given grasp of basic skills of communication, computation, research and analysis would seem to accelerate, not hinder, the progress of that student’s pursuit of their interest. I hold as my mission, (stephenriviere.com): “Within an environment of trust, I believe that the better interest of children can be met by allowing them to become aware of what they do well, and care enough about themselves to develop those talents, so that they may become independent, well functioning, satisfied members of our global community. The question is, of course, how to give the student enough room to move, to have the time to contemplate and investigate, within the structure set up for the prescribed “basics” that we otherwise know as state or national standards. Is it fair to have a certain body of knowledge that every citizen should possess? I think so, but with the understanding that a standards based curriculum could infringe upon the space, the autonomy, the student needs to grow in the direction he should. Zhoa (2009) makes a good case that the United States is falling behind India and China, while asking a critical question, “... will these gaps really decide the future of American children?” (Kindle Location 315). Domestically, he claims that “clearly that poverty significantly affects school performance and is responsible for the gaps between the poor, urban, minority students and their middle-class, suburban, white peers. (Kindle Locations 335-336). A drive toward national standards, using NCLB as evidence, pushes the focus toward testing compliance, at a minimum, and leadership at its worst. The tunnel vision that occurs as schools compete to keep up, or outperform, shuts down focus on the arts, social studies, physical education, and anything residing outside of the testing range. He contends that a focus on testing is not only destructive and a distraction from following our natural curiosities, but is a manipulation for the sake of political power. “Public fear enabled American politicians to achieve many things that had not been possible before, including providing federal assistance to public education, an area of power that, because it is not mentioned in the U.S. Constitution, was reserved for state and local governments.” (Kindle Locations 453-454). The 1983 NCEE report “A Nation at Risk” served to partner up government with business interests to control the direction of education policies. Despite the emphasis on testing, the system still retains its innate power, otherwise how come the “United States ranked number one out of 131 countries on the 2007–08 Global Competitiveness Index”? (Kindle Locations 733-734). Both India, and in particular, China, understand that the integral factor missing from their especially testing-oriented educational systems is creativity and innovation. It is interesting to note that this is the seventh of Wagner’s (2014) survival skills. A move toward an authoritarian led system stressing standards, accountability and punishment feeds external motivations that stifle individualism and in turn, the innovation that results. “In the lack of standards and evaluation we see one of the greatest values of American culture expressed in education: the value of individuals.” (Kindle Locations 820-821). It is supremely un-American to force homogeneity and conformity; that pervasive nature shines through in our system that celebrates the individual, especially in the context of embracing Horatio Alger. This instructor, is hesitant to accept the Alger narrative in light of the threat the American Dream is currently facing due to extreme income inequities. Zhoa quotes per capita income as an indicator of America’s wealth relative to global competitors without spending much time explaining the an average does not speak to distribution. A main driving force of the American Dream is the notion of “getting someplace”. Envisionment allows you to accept the cost of hard work now in order to reap future benefit -- the same way saving, not spending all of your income now, is more palatable if you know for what you are saving. The concept you hold of your future self, how that feels, tastes, breathes -- how real you can make it, drives you forward. If it is pleasant. If your concept of the future is dismal stagnation, or in the case of many low-income kids, incarceration and suffering, then that produces another kind of incentive: to care less about making any investment in yourself, because there is no point. McDonald’s restaurants across the nation certifiably produce the same burger with stunning, uninteresting reliability. They are miles easier to manage than a fussy chef producing unique and complicated cuisine, but where would you rather eat? What kind of student should our educational system produce? Daniel Pink (2012) suggests we move away from the typical methods of punishment and rewards that are overused in attempting to motivate people. He says three things get people moving, the intrinsic desires for autonomy, mastery, and purpose. Letting a student follow their passions takes advantage of exactly those motivators, which will allow them a sense of fulfillment and satisfaction. As a consequence of so purposeful a pursuit, the student’s learning does not narrow, but rather deepens as it spreads, producing the innovation that has allowed our country such continued prosperity. Why crimp that? Resources: Pink, Daniel H. (2012). Drive the surprising truth about what motivates us. Penguin Group, NY. Wagner, Tony (2014-03-11). The Global Achievement Gap: Why Even Our Best Schools Don't Teach the New Survival Skills Our Children Need and What We Can Do About It. Basic Books. Kindle Edition. Zhao, Yong (2009-09-18). Catching Up or Leading the Way: American Education in the Age of Globalization (Kindle Location 315). Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development. Kindle Edition.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorTwenty-one years of teaching, and I'm still fascinated with my role as an educator. What will it be like as a principal? Archives
January 2017
Categories |